Penn State linebacker Micah Parsons finalist for Butkus Award | TribLIVE.com
Penn State

Penn State linebacker Micah Parsons finalist for Butkus Award

Michael Love
1990253_web1_gtr-PSUParsons-100919
Penn State linebacker Micah Parsons (11) and defensive end Shaka Toney (18) celebrate a sack of Purdue quarterback Jack Plummer (13) in the second half of a Big Ten game Oct. 5, 2019, in State College, Pa. Penn State defeated Purdue 35-7.

The Butkus Award is presented annually to the nation’s top collegiate linebacker, and Penn State sophomore Micah Parsons is one of six finalists for this year’s honor.

The finalists were announced Monday, and Wisconsin’s Zack Baun, Texas Tech’s Jordyn Brooks, Clemson’s Isaiah Simmons, California’s Evan Weaver and Wyoming’s Logan Wilson also are on the list.

The 6-foot-3, 245-pound Parsons is the first Butkus finalist from Penn State since Dan Connor in 2007, and he hopes to be the first Nittany Lion to take home the award since Paul Posluszny in 2005.

LaVar Arrington was the Butkus winner in 1999.

Shane Conlan (1986), Andre Collins (1989) and Brandon Short (1999) are other Penn State linebackers to earn the nod as a Butkus finalist.

Parsons leads the Nittany Lions in tackles with 85. In that total are 10 for a loss and two sacks.

He ranks seventh in the Big Ten with 7.7 tackles per game and has recorded 10 or more tackles five times this season.

Parsons, a Rivals Midseason All-American, was selected to the Pro Football Focus Big Ten Team of the Week first team after Penn State’s win over Purdue and the second team after a triumph against Pitt.

The Nittany Lions conclude their season Saturday at home against Rutgers. Kickoff is set for 3:30 p.m.

Michael Love is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-856-7400 x8632, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penn State
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.