ShareThis Page
Penn State’s slide continues with overtime loss to Purdue | TribLIVE.com
News

Penn State’s slide continues with overtime loss to Purdue

The Associated Press
| Thursday, January 31, 2019 1:30 a.m
698877_web1_698877-ed50b025fa4b4eec9f3f99197c9e1e47
AP
Penn State’s Kyle McCloskey shoots between Purdue’s Matt Haarms (left) and Eric Hunter Jr. during the first half Thursday, Jan. 31, 2019, in State College.

STATE COLLEGE — Matt Painter was surprised to see his best player getting open shots early. He wasn’t surprised when Carsen Edwards made one after the other and then drained the well-defended ones later.

The Big Ten’s leading scorer finished with 38 points, including 20 in the first half and a four-point play in overtime, to lead No. 17 Purdue past Penn State, 99-90, on Thursday night.

“He’s obviously a dynamic player,” Painter said. “When he’s really feeling it, he’s got such range that guys will back up a little bit like he’s not going to shoot it.”

Edwards kept shooting, going 8 of 15 from 3-point range and 12 for 24 overall.

Ryan Cline added 20 points, and Trevion Williams scored 10 for the Boilermakers (15-6, 7-2 Big Ten), who led for all but 4 minutes, 33 seconds to win their sixth straight.

Lamar Stevens scored 24 points, Rasir Bolton added 18, Myles Dread scored 14 and Josh Reaves picked up 11 for the Nittany Lions (7-14, 0-10), who lost their eighth straight. Mike Watkins had 10 points and 11 rebounds.

Penn State coach Patrick Chambers shook his head recounting the deep shots Purdue hit, sometimes with the heels of their sneakers inches away from the edge of the midcourt Nittany Lion logo.

“It almost looked like we didn’t game-plan for Edwards,” Chambers said. “It’s incredible what he does with the basketball.”

Chambers has said his team is close to breaking out of its funk, and the Nittany Lions looked like it, playing their most inspired game since the eight-game skid began.

Purdue led by as many as 17 in the first half and by eight with 5:45 to play in regulation before Stevens and Dread helped lift Penn State. The duo combined to go 9 for 10 from the free-throw line over the next five minutes, and Dread nailed a pair of 3-pointers before Bolton gave Penn State its first lead of the game. His mid-range jumper made it 85-83 with 54 seconds left.

Edwards drove for a tying layup with 5 seconds left to send the game to overtime. Early in the extra period, he was fouled while making his eighth 3-pointer of the game, and he hit the free throw to put Purdue ahead by six.

The Boilermakers scored the first eight points and were 7 for 7 from the foul line in overtime.

Purdue dominated the first 11 minutes thanks to Edwards, who hit five of his six first-half 3-pointers in that span to help spot the Boilermakers a 31-14 lead.

But Penn State got back-to-back 3s from Bolton that sparked its offense. The Nittany Lions put together a 23-10 run over the final 6:31 before Aaron Wheeler made it 50-44 at the buzzer with Purdue’s 10th 3-pointer of the half.

The Boilermakers were outrebounded for a second straight game, with the Nittany Lions pulling down 41 to Purdue’s 32. Meanwhile, Penn State made a season-high 30 free throws on 41 attempts.

“I don’t think we’re hitting enough,” Painter said. “When shots go up, you’ve got to really hit people and then go get the basketball.”

Stevens voiced his displeasure for what appeared to be a blown call in the final minute of overtime that would have sent him to the line.

Driving to the basket, Stevens drew contact from Grady Eifert and immediately looked toward an official. No call came, and the Boilermakers took possession.

“I drove the ball right, I got fouled and it was a no-call,” Stevens said. “It was a blatant foul. Refs need help.”



Categories: PennState | Sports
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.