Peters Township native Alison Riske makes Wimbledon history | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World Sports

Peters Township native Alison Riske makes Wimbledon history

Associated Press
1366342_web1_1366342-5b6c37828ca7434fb5a602da5042862d
AP
Peters Township native Alison Riske returns to Croatia’s Donna Vekic in a singles match during Day 2 of Wimbledon in London, Tuesday, July 2, 2019. (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth)

WIMBLEDON, England — In her ninth appearance at the All England Club, Alison Riske finally has a piece of Wimbledon history.

The unseeded American became the first player to win a match under the new roof on No. 1 Court after rallying to beat Donna Vekic 3-6, 6-3, 7-5 in the first round.

“I’ve been waiting to have my place in history, so I’m glad I finally made it,” Riske, a Peters Township native, said with a laugh. “It was awesome. It was really cool. I didn’t know what I was expecting, but obviously at Wimbledon, I knew it was going to be great, and what an experience it was. I’m really thrilled to come out with a win.”

The roof was closed at 5-5 in the third set because of the fading light, and Riske earned the decisive break after play resumed.

The match originally was scheduled for an outside court but was moved when the third match on No. 1 Court finished early. That made for an unusual venue for Riske, although she did play on Centre Court in 2011 when she pushed Vera Zvonareva to three sets in the first round.

“It was a few years since I was on Centre or Court 1, but I had been there before, and I’m just feeling more and more comfortable in different situations now that I’m a little bit older,” the 28-year-old Riske said. “And it was an awesome atmosphere. It never gets old hearing your name get called out in there.”

Categories: Sports | US-World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.