Peters Township’s Alison Riske advances to 3rd round at Wimbledon | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World Sports

Peters Township’s Alison Riske advances to 3rd round at Wimbledon

Matt Rosenberg
1373431_web1_AP_19185484879871
AP
Peters Township native Alison Riske returns to Jorovic during their second-round match at Wimbledon.
1373431_web1_AP_19185538796701
AP
Peters Township native Alison Riske returns to Jorovic during their second-round match at Wimbledon.

This one needed overtime.

After handily winning the first set and then dropping a second-set tiebreak, Peters Township native Alison Riske bounced back and defeated Ivana Jorovic, 6-2, 6-7 (3), 9-7, in a nearly 3-hour match to advance to the third round at Wimbledon.

Riske quickly took the first set, but she lost her stroke in the second and Jorovic found hers. Riske had 12 unforced errors in the second set compared to six in the first.

And Jorovic took advantage, connecting on 20 winners in the second set, compared to just seven in the first set.


Riske never has advanced beyond the third round at Wimbledon, reaching it in 2013, ‘14, and ‘17. She plays at 6 a.m. Eastern time Saturday, when she will face 13th-ranked Belinda Bencic, a straight-set winner over Kaia Kanepi.

Matt Rosenberg is a Tribune-Review assistant multimedia editor. You can contact Matt at 412-320-7937, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | US-World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.