Pirates’ Adam Frazier takes advantage of Kevin Newman’s day off | TribLIVE.com

Pirates’ Adam Frazier takes advantage of Kevin Newman’s day off

Jerry DiPaola
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates second baseman Adam Frazier scores past Cubs catcher Victor Caratini during the first inning Monday at PNC Park.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates manager Clint Hurdle greets first baseman Josh Bell at the dugout after Bell’s three-run home run during the first inning against the Cubs Monday, July 1, 2019, at PNC Park.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates second baseman Adam Frazier takes batting practice before a game against the Cubs Monday, July 1, 2019, at PNC Park.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates second baseman Adam Frazier scores during the first inning against the Cubs Monday, July 1, 2019, at PNC Park.

Clint Hurdle didn’t write Kevin Newman’s name in the Pittsburgh Pirates starting lineup Monday night against the Chicago Cubs for the first time since June 9.

Newman, whose Pirates modern-day rookie record 19-game hitting streak ended Sunday, was replaced at shortstop by Jung Ho Kang and in the leadoff spot in the batting order by Adam Frazier.

Hurdle’s intent was to give Newman a day off, and Frazier had batted leadoff 45 times this season before Newman grabbed the job.

“Just didn’t want to disrupt the other guys, and Frazier has experience leading off,” he said. “Newman’s played more innings than anybody since the 10th of (June). That’s all part of the recovery program. I’m not going to bust him up and take him out in the middle of a hitting streak to give him a day off.

“It’s just the fact the physical work. You give him a blow, and we’ll plug him back in (Tuesday). We’ve had some success with it over the years.”

He had success with it Monday, too. Frazier hit four doubles to tie a major-league record.

Hurdle, a pitcher?

When Josh Bell steps into the batter’s box at Cleveland’s Progressive Field next Monday for the Home Run Derby, Clint Hurdle will be only a spectator, perhaps tucked into his couch in front of the TV at home.

Which is just fine with the manager, who threw nearly 200 pitches in the 1999 Home Run Derby at Boston’s Fenway Park.

At the time, Hurdle was the Colorado Rockies hitting coach (three years before he became their manager). He was working closely with the Rockies’ Larry Walker, who was on his way to the ’99 National League batting title. Hurdle was Walker’s natural choice to throw to him in the Derby.

Walker solved Hurdle’s tosses for only two home runs, and he was eliminated in the first round.

“I was the only guy who got Walker out that year,” Hurdle said. “I figured, ‘I’m done. This didn’t work out very well. It’s over. Walker’s going to kill me.’ ”

Then, Jeff Bagwell asked Hurdle to throw to him. After Bagwell hit five homers to advance, Jeromy Burnitz, who knew Hurdle from their time together in the New York Mets organization, came to him in a panic. His pitcher had taken ill.

When Burnitz hit six homers off Hurdle, here comes Ken Griffey Jr.’s posse, looking for a pitcher.

“Yeah, let me turn this one down,” Hurdle said, laughing.

As it turned out, Griffey Jr. beat Burnitz in the final round.

“I threw to four guys in the first round. Three got to the semifinals. Two got to the finals,” Hurdle said. “I threw 190-some pitches. I was a little tired at the end of the day.”

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pirates
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.