Pirates beat Yankees but lose Lonnie Chisenhall to ‘lower extremity tightness’ | TribLIVE.com

Pirates beat Yankees but lose Lonnie Chisenhall to ‘lower extremity tightness’

Kevin Gorman
The Indians’ Lonnie Chisenhall hits an RBI single during the first inning against the Cardinals on Tuesday, June 26, 2018, in St. Louis.

Both Corey Dickerson and Steven Baron went 2-for-3 with a two RBIs, as the Pittsburgh Pirates beat the New York Yankees, 8-7, Saturday afternoon at LECOM Park in Bradenton, Fla.

But the bigger story was what the Pirates lost.

Right fielder Lonnie Chisenhall, signed to start while Gregory Polanco recovers from shoulder surgery, left the game with what the Pirates described as “general lower extremity tightness.” Chisenhall played in only 29 games last season with the Cleveland Indians because of calf issues.

Jordan Lyles, one of a handful of pitchers fighting for the fifth spot in the starting rotation, allowed seven hits and three runs in three innings for the Pirates.

The Pirates play the Tampa Bay Rays at 1:05 p.m. Sunday at LECOM Park. Mitch Keller, their top prospect, is schedule to start against right-hander Ryne Stanek. Clay Holmes, Kyle Crick, Aaron Slegers, Geoff Hartlieb and Luis Escobar are also expected to pitch for the Pirates. Joe Musgrove will throw two innings in a simulated game at Pirate City.

Love baseball? Stay up-to-date with the latest Pittsburgh Pirates news.

Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Kevin by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pirates
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.