Pirates’ Cole Tucker finally gets a real hit off Fernando Rodney | TribLIVE.com

Pirates’ Cole Tucker finally gets a real hit off Fernando Rodney

Jerry DiPaola
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates shortstop Cole Tucker bats against the A’s Sunday, May 5, 2019, at PNC Park.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates center fielder Starling Marte celebrates with Melky Cabrera and Cole Tucker after his walk-off home run during the 13th inning against the A’s Sunday, May 5, 2019, at PNC Park.

Cole Tucker said his single that started the Pittsburgh Pirates’ 13th-inning rally Sunday wasn’t the first time he faced the Oakland A’s Fernando Rodney. Only the first time he’s hit against the 42-year-old relief pitcher in the flesh.

“I played against Fernando Rodney a ton, growing up, in video games,” said Tucker, 22. “It’s way easier in video games, I promise.”

The single sparked the Pirates’ 5-3 come-from-behind victory, but it only lifted the Pirates’ rookie shortstop’s batting average to .208 after he brought an 0-for-12 slump to the plate in the 13th.

Perhaps juiced by his seven assists and Starling Marte’s game-winning home run three at-bats after his single, Tucker was as pleased as any .400 hitter when he met reporters after the game.

“I needed that,” he said. “To go up there and put a good swing on the ball meant a lot.”

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pirates
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.