Pirates designate Jung Ho Kang for assignment | TribLIVE.com

Pirates designate Jung Ho Kang for assignment

Chris Harlan
Pittsburgh Pirates’ Jung Ho Kang rounds third base after hitting a solo home run off Milwaukee Brewers starting pitcher Junior Guerra during the ninth inning of a baseball game in Pittsburgh, Friday, July 5, 2019.

The glove was still there, but two seasons away from the majors was probably too much for Jung Ho Kang’s bat to overcome.

“That’s our take on it,” manager Clint Hurdle said Friday after the Pirates designated the Korean infielder for assignment. “Love the growth of the man off the field. Love the growth of the man in the clubhouse. Defensively his game came back to him. … He’s handled himself professionally with everything except consistency with the bat.”

Kang, 32, was batting .169 with 18 extra-base hits in 172 at-bats. Over the past 10 games, he was mired in a 1 for 21 slump.

“This season I didn’t do really well, unexpectedly,” Kang said through interpreter Jeffrey Kim. “I feel definitely a little bad for the team, fans, manager and everybody with the Pirates.”

Kang showed star potential in his first season with the Pirates, batting .287 with 15 home runs in 2015. He followed that with 21 homers in 2016, before legal issues and immigration trouble forced him to miss all of 2017 and nearly the entire 2018 season, as well.

He said he wasn’t sure what was in his future. He didn’t rule out a return to South Korea but said he’s appreciated his time with the Pirates.

“It was really an honor,” he said. “It was my dream when I was in Korea playing baseball, to become a major league player.”

Chris Harlan is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pirates
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.