ShareThis Page
Pirates farm report for games of Saturday, May 4, 2019 | TribLIVE.com
Pirates/MLB

Pirates farm report for games of Saturday, May 4, 2019

1116387_web1_gtr-newminorslogos-xxxxxx

INDIANAPOLIS (Triple-A, 15-13) lost 6-3 to Louisville (Reds). LHP Brandon Waddell (0-2, 8.56) took the loss after allowing five runs in 2/3 of an inning of relief. RHP Dario Agrazal (2-1, 1.32) allowed an unearned run in seven innings with seven strikeouts in a no decision. 1B Will Craig (.263) hit a first-inning, two-run homer.

Next: Sunday vs. Louisville, 1:35 p.m.

ALTOONA (Double-A, 15-13) won 8-3 over Richmond (Giants). The Curve scored seven second-innings and led 8-0 after three. OF Bralin Jackson (.271) finished 3 for 5 with a double and two RBIs. C Jason Delay (.361) went 4 for 4 with a triple and an RBI. RHP Cam Vieaux (1-2, 2.67) earned the win, striking out six in five innings.

Next: Sunday at Richmond, 1:05 p.m.

BRADENTON (High-A, 18-10) defeated Lakeland (Tigers), 5-4, in 10 innings. 3B Dylan Busby (.232) homered in the bottom of the ninth to tie the score at 4-4. In the next inning, C Deon Stafford (.190) drove in the winning run with a single to right field, knocking in SS Robbie Glendinning (.341). RHP Nick Mears (1-0, 0.00) picked up the win after pitching a spotless ninth and 10th with three strikeouts and no hits allowed.

Next: Sunday vs. Lakeland, 1 p.m.

GREENSBORO (Low-A, 17-10) was delayed by rain against West Virginia (Mariners).

Next: Sunday vs. West Virgina (Mariners), 2 p.m.

Categories: Sports | Pirates
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.