Pirates’ Jim Leyland used a reliever as a starter long before Clint Hurdle | TribLIVE.com
Pirates/MLB

Pirates’ Jim Leyland used a reliever as a starter long before Clint Hurdle

Jerry DiPaola
1179532_web1_1144883265
Getty Images
The Pirates’ Montana DuRapau delivers during the first inning against the Padres on Saturday, May 18, 2019, in San Diego.

When Clint Hurdle called on relief pitcher Montana DuRapau to start for the Pittsburgh Pirates on Saturday night, Hurdle, a baseball lifer, displayed his willingness to — in words he likes to use — adapt, improvise and overcome.

But he wasn’t breaking new ground as a Pirates manager.

Jim Leyland did the same thing — for a different reason — but it wasn’t in an random game in May that ended after midnight on the East Coast. He handed the ball to right-handed reliever Ted Power to start Game 6 of the 1990 National League Championship Series against the Cincinnati Reds. It was an elimination game with the Pirates down 3-2. So it mattered a bit more than the Pirates’ 7-2 victory in San Diego on Saturday.

Zane Smith, a left-hander who had been acquired in a trade with the Montreal Expos in August, was in line to start. But Leyland was trying to outfox Reds manager Lou Piniella.

Leyland’s plan was to entice Piniella into assembling a lefty-heavy lineup so he could counter with Smith after a few innings. But Piniella started all right-handed hitters, with the exception of Paul O’Neill.

“It almost worked,” Power told the Dayton Daily News last year when he was the Reds’ bullpen coach. The quote came from a discussion reporter Hal McCoy was having about the Tampa Bay Rays starting reliever Sergio Romo in two consecutive games.

“Been there, done that,” Power said.

The problem for the Pirates in Game 6 was they managed only one hit — an RBI double by first baseman Carmelo Martinez — and ended up losing the game 2-1 and the series to the Reds. Cincinnati walked Barry Bonds three times. The Reds then swept the Oakland A’s in four games in the World Series.

Martinez almost tied it in the ninth, but right fielder Glenn Braggs, a late-inning defensive replacement, robbed him of a home run.

It was the Pirates’ first playoff appearance since the 1979 World Series.

Power, who appeared in 564 career games with only 85 starts, recorded a save in Game 1 of the NLCS and hadn’t started a game all season (although he did so 34 times for the Reds in 1987). He did not pitch badly in Game 6, allowing only three hits and one run in 2 1/3 innings before he was replaced by Smith.

Piniella pinch-hit for O’Neill in the bottom of the seventh against Smith with switch-hitter Luis Quinones, who drove in the decisive run. Leyland also used relievers Stan Belinda and Bill Landrum to quell the Reds’ bats.

Fun fact: The starting pitchers in the game, Power and the Reds’ Danny Jackson, were traded for each other in 1987 after Power, who played 13 seasons for eight teams, had been with the Reds.

More trivia: Power was back with the Reds the following season.

Hurdle’s chief aim in starting DuRapau and following up with five other relievers was to fill a hole in the rotation created by injuries to Jameson Taillon and Trevor Williams.

Three decades earlier, Leyland’s aim was different: He was trying to get to the World Series.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pirates
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.