ShareThis Page
Pirates’ Josh Bell is ripping up fantasy leagues, too | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Pirates’ Josh Bell is ripping up fantasy leagues, too

Tim Benz
1170470_web1_1143364212
Getty Images
The Pirates’ Josh Bell hits a three-run home run in the seventh inning against the St. Louis Cardinals at Busch Stadium on May 12, 2019 in St. Louis.

After a week off, I check in with Jeff Erickson of Rotowire for our usual fantasy sports podcast.

We start off by looking at what had been some of the early warning signs for Josh Bell’s huge start to the year. Melky Cabrera’s performance over the first month and a half of the season has been nice for fantasy owners, as well as Pirates fans in general.

Then we get into Chris Archer’s disappointing return and Arizona’s dominance of the Pirates all year long.

Jeff McNeil is a wonderful fantasy success story for the New York Mets. Also, owners of any and all Astros had a thrilling week.


LISTEN: Breaking down Josh Bell’s fantasy impact and more

It’s a great time for those in golf leagues, too, thanks to the PGA Championship getting moved up earlier in the year.

On the football front, what will be the ripple effect of the New York Jets front-office shakeup for Le’Veon Bell?

And those who are in NBA leagues have to start wondering how Zion Williamson likely going to New Orleans will alter the roundball world.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.