Pirates may be forced to find alternatives to Steven Brault, Nick Kingham | TribLIVE.com

Pirates may be forced to find alternatives to Steven Brault, Nick Kingham

Jerry DiPaola
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates pitcher Nick Kingham talks with Steven Brault in the dugout during a game against the Texas Rangers Wednesday, May 8, 2019, at PNC Park.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates pitcher Nick Kingham talks with Steven Brault in the dugout during a game against the Texas Rangers Wednesday, May 8, 2019, at PNC Park.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates pitching coach Ray Searage talks with pitcher Nick Kingham during the first inning against the Rangers Wednesday, May 8, 2019, at PNC Park.

When the Pittsburgh Pirates put Jameson Taillon on the 10-day injured list May 4 with an elbow flexor tendon strain, it sounded serious. There was no way he could return in 10 days, or even a month.

The worst fears were realized Monday when Taillon was moved to the 60-day list. That guarantees his absence will stretch into the first week of July — right in the middle of a crucial seven-game homestand with the Chicago Cubs and Milwaukee Brewers and immediately before the All-Star break. Trips to Chicago and St. Louis follow the four-day break.

Taillon’s absence, coupled with Chris Archer’s thumb injury, weakened the strength of the team — the starting rotation — and forced Steven Brault and Nick Kingham to start two games. The results haven’t been good. Their total numbers in two starts each have been equally bad.

Brault, a starter throughout his minor-league career, has worked 7 2/3 innings in his past two starts, allowing 11 hits (three homers), eight runs (all earned) and five walks. He also hit a batter. The Pirates won both games by scoring 15 runs.

Kingham, who said he prefers starting, has surrendered 13 hits (two homers), nine runs (all earned) and four walks in eight innings. The Pirates lost both, 9-6 and 9-3. The lineup isn’t strong enough to withstand sustained failure among the starters.

What’s next?

More uncertainty with two of the other four starters — Joe Musgrove and Chris Archer — going to the mound Tuesday and Wednesday against the Arizona Diamondbacks with question marks hovering over their heads.

Musgrove’s ERA has risen from 1.54 to 4.20, thanks to his two most recent starts. Archer hasn’t pitched since April 26 while recovering from a thumb injury.

Trevor Williams and Jordan Lyles have no issues, but after those four pitch the next four nights in Arizona and San Diego, that leaves a weekend game for a fifth starter (Brault or Kingham, unless Neal Huntington bites his lower lip and brings up Mitch Keller from Triple-A Indianapolis).

Clint Hurdle likes to say that no one will feel sorry for the Pirates in their current predicament, and he’s right. The schedule offers no relief. After Monday’s off day, the Pirates play 14 games in 13 days, including a Memorial Day doubleheader in Cincinnati.

This is a crucial point in the season, with the Pirates only one game out in a tight National League wild-card chase. That’s a nice cushion to have while waiting for Taillon’s return, but unless Huntington finds a fifth starter, it could be gone well before the 4th of July.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pirates
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.