ShareThis Page
Pirates minor league report: Curve no-hit by SeaWolves’ Mize | TribLIVE.com
Pirates/MLB

Pirates minor league report: Curve no-hit by SeaWolves’ Mize

1091505_web1_gtr-newminorslogos-xxxxxx

INDIANAPOLIS (Triple-A, 12-10) won 5-3 over Columbus (Indians). 2B Kevin Kramer (.222) led Indianapolis offensively, going 2 for 4 at-bat with a solo home run and two runs scored. 3B Ke’Bryan Hayes (.267) chipped in with a double. RHP Dario Agrazal (1-0, 2.70) picked up the win after throwing 6 2/3 innings. Agrazal finished with six strikeouts, a walk and two runs allowed on five hits.

Next: Tuesday vs. Columbus, 11:05 a.m.

ALTOONA (Double-A, 11-12) was held hitless in a 1-0 loss to Erie (Tigers). The SeaWolves’ RHP Casey Mize (1-0, 0.00) threw a no-hitter with seven strikeouts. A seventh-inning walk kept Mize from a perfect game. LHP Cam Vieaux (0-2, 2.20) was the tough-luck loser for the Curve, allowing just a run on six hits with a strikeout and two walks.

Next: Tuesday vs. Erie, 6 p.m.

BRADENTON (High-A, 16-8) was idle. The expected starting pitchers are yet to be determined.

Next: Tuesday at Jupiter (Marlins), 6:30 p.m.

GREENSBORO (Low-A, 14-9) was idle. RHP Brad Case (2-1, 1.59) is the probable starting pitcher for the Grasshoppers.

Next: Tuesday vs. Rome (Braves), 7 p.m.

Categories: Sports | Pirates
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.