Pirates minor league report for Aug. 25, 2019 | TribLIVE.com

Pirates minor league report for Aug. 25, 2019


INDIANAPOLIS (Triple-A, 64-67) won 7-0 at home against Louisville (Reds). C Christian Kelley (.185) went 2 for 4 with a double, two RBIs and a run. LHP Brandon Waddell (3-6, 8.58 ERA) went six innings allowing no runs on three hits with seven strikeouts and three walks.

Next: Sunday vs. Louisville (Reds), 2 p.m.


ALTOONA (Double-A, 65-66) lost 3-2 at Bowie (Orioles). SS Oneil Cruz (.284) went 2 for 4 with a double and a solo home run. LHP Cam Vieaux (3-4, 2.47) went six innings allowing three runs on one hit with three strikeouts and four walks.

Next: Sunday at Bowie (Orioles), 1:35 p.m.


BRADENTON (High-A, 70-60) won 9-6 at home against Daytona (Reds). DH Lucas Tancas (.280) went 2 for 4 with a three-run homer, two runs scored and four total RBIs. RHP Gavin Wallace (5-8, 4.28 ERA) went five innings allowing three runs on eight hits with three strikeouts and no walks.

Next: Sunday vs. Daytona (Reds), 1 p.m.


GREENSBORO (Low-A, 74-54) game at Hickory (Rangers) did not finish in time for this edition.

Next: Sunday at Hickory (Rangers), 5 p.m.


WEST VIRGINIA (Short season-A, 36-30) lost 6-2 at Auburn (Nationals). RF Matthew Frazier (.234) went 2 for 4 with an RBI. RHP Jesus Valles (3-2, 3.54 ERA) went six innings allowing four runs on four hits three strikeouts and one walk.

Next: Sunday at Auburn (Nationals), 6:05 p.m.

Categories: Sports | Pirates
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.