Pirates minor league report: June 15, 2019 | TribLIVE.com
Pirates/MLB

Pirates minor league report: June 15, 2019

1300207_web1_gtr-newminorslogos-xxxxxx

INDIANAPOLIS (Triple-A, 35-30): Postponed by rain vs. Pawtucket (Red Sox).

Next: Sunday doubleheader vs. Pawtucket

ALTOONA (Double-A, 34-31): defeated Binghamton (Mets), 5-1. 1B Jerrick Suiter (.242) had a pair of RBIs, as did RF Bligh Madris. Madris (.249) hit his third homer of the season, and 3B Hunter Owen (.300) hit his 15th. RHP Pedro Vazquez (6-1, 2.45) earned the victory, allowing one earned run on four hits in seven innings.

Next: Sunday at Binghamton

BRADENTON (Single-A Advanced, 36-30): was idle.

Next: Monday vs. Clearwater (Phillies)

GREENSBORO (Single-A, 43-25): defeated Kannapolis (White Sox), 4-0. RHP Osvaldo Bido earned the victory, pitching seven innings to move to 8-4 with a 3.06 ERA. He struck out seven and didn’t walk a batter. 1B Mason Martin (.262) hit his 18th homer and drove in two runs. SS Connor Kaiser (.209) also homered, his fourth.

Next: Sunday at Kannapolis.

WEST VIRGINIA (Short-season A, 1-1): defeated Mahoning Valley (Indians), 6-3. The Black Bears benefitted from three unearned runs. CF Brett Kinneman (.143) had a hit and scored twice. LF Jonah Davis (.000) also scored a pair of runs after reaching on three walks. RHP Francis Del Orbe (1-0, 0.00) earned the win, pitching 2 2/3 innings without allowing a run. RHP Jesus Valles started, going 4 1/3 innings and giving up two earned runs on six hits.

Next: Today at Williamsport (Phillies)

Categories: Sports | Pirates
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.