ShareThis Page
Pirates pitchers shelled in 10-1 loss to Twins | TribLIVE.com
Pirates/MLB

Pirates pitchers shelled in 10-1 loss to Twins

Jerry DiPaola
860148_web1_793392-1942f01c0cba4f009ecef34856b25fcf
AP
Pittsburgh Pirates players warm up before a spring training baseball game against the Philadelphia Phillies, Saturday, Feb. 23, 2019, in Clearwater, Fla.

Pittsburgh Pirates pitching couldn’t solve the Minnesota Twins’ hitters Saturday in a 10-1 loss in Bradenton, Fla.

Starter Clay Holmes allowed three hits and three runs — two earned — in three innings, and reliever Keone Kela had a horrific inning in the fifth, giving up four hits and four runs. Later, Tyler Lyons pitched 1 2/3 innings and surrendered three runs on three hits.

Designated hitter Corey Dickerson was 2 for 2 and has seven hits in 11 at-bats this spring. But he left the game with right-ankle discomfort and is day-to-day.

Center fielder JB Shuck played the first six innings and had a hit in two at-bats. He has reached base safely in seven of his past nine plate appearances.

At Pirate City, Joe Musgrove threw 53 pitches and three innings in a simulated game.

The Pirates (8-7-1) will play the New York Yankees on Sunday in Tampa, Fla. Chris Archer is expected to start against New York’s J.A. Happ. Nick Burdi, Jesus Liranzo, Geoff Hartlieb and Alex McRae are also scheduled to pitch for the Pirates.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pirates
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.