Pirates players insist their July output is sustainable | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Pirates players insist their July output is sustainable

Tim Benz
1392189_web1_GTR-Gorman01-062419
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
The Pirates’ Kevin Newman is mobbed by teammates after defeating the Padres on a bases loaded base on balls during the 11th inning Sunday, June 23, 2019, at PNC Park.

During the All-Star break, we discussed how Pirates management may view the recent surge by their players now that they are within 2 1/2 games of first place in the National League Central.

They sound optimistic. But I bet the jury is still out.

It should be.

Because for as optimistic as everyone wants to be about the great output from some of the young hitters and the productivity from all those veterans off the bench, you have to wonder how sustainable that is.


You also have to wonder whether the pitching staff is ever going to get healthy and back in form. And you have to wonder whether the Cubs, Cardinals and Brewers are going to live up to their preseason hype.

That’s why the likes of Clint Hurdle and Neal Huntington may still need to be sold a bit on the results they are seeing. But the players themselves seem confident that the hot stretch the Pirates enjoyed before the All-Star break (winning 12 of 17) was legitimate.

In today’s “Breakfast With Benz” podcast, Kevin Newman, Trevor Williams and Bryan Reynolds talk about their attempts to keep the momentum going once the second half of the season kicks off Friday in Chicago.


LISTEN: Pirates players insist July output is sustainable

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.