Injured Pirates reliever Keone Kela feels ‘good, strong’ in bullpen session |

Injured Pirates reliever Keone Kela feels ‘good, strong’ in bullpen session

Chris Adamski
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates reliever Keone Kela celebrates as the winning run scores in a walk-off victory over the Cubs Wednesday, July 3, 2019, at PNC Park.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates reliever Keone Kela watches batting practice at PNC Park.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates reliever Keone Kela watches batting practice before a game against the Cubs at PNC Park.

The Pittsburgh Pirates have had one of baseball’s best bullpens during the past three-plus weeks, and the unit has been missing one of its best arms.

That player appears close to rejoining his fellow relievers.

Keone Kela experienced no setbacks during a bullpen throwing session Wednesday. Kela has been on the injured list since May 8 because of shoulder inflammation.

“Everything went very, very well,” manager Clint Hurdle said of Kela’s work, which included 29 pitches. “He felt good. He felt strong.”

That’s an improvement over when Kela first attempted to test his shoulder early last month. He was subsequently shut down for about 10 days after things “just didn’t feel right.”

The next step for Kela is to pitch a simulated game Saturday. If all goes well, he could be back with the Pirates after next week’s All-Star break.

Kela, the Texas Rangers closer last season until the Pirates traded for him at the deadline, entered the season as the primary setup man for closer Felipe Vazquez. Kela has averaged more strikeouts (11.0) than hits and walks (10.26) per nine innings over his career.

Love baseball? Stay up-to-date with the latest Pittsburgh Pirates news.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pirates
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.