ShareThis Page

Cubs' Maddon fires back at Hurdle for criticizing Baez

| Friday, April 13, 2018, 2:18 p.m.
Manager Joe Maddon #70 of the Chicago Cubs paces the dugout during the Opening Day home game against the Pittsburgh Pirates at Wrigley Field on April 10, 2018 in Chicago, Illinois.
Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images
Manager Joe Maddon #70 of the Chicago Cubs paces the dugout during the Opening Day home game against the Pittsburgh Pirates at Wrigley Field on April 10, 2018 in Chicago, Illinois.

CHICAGO — Cubs manager Joe Maddon fired back at Pittsburgh Pirates skipper Clint Hurdle for criticizing Chicago star Javier Baez's bat flip on a popup.

Maddon was “surprised” and didn't “really understand” why Hurdle criticized Baez. He also said he believes “in not interfering with other groups.”

“Be careful when you start becoming hypercritical because you're pretty much defining yourself,” Maddon said prior to Friday's game against Atlanta.

The 25-year-old Baez homered twice for the second straight day in Chicago's victory over Pittsburgh on Wednesday. But he also flipped his bat high into the air on a popup to shortstop Jordy Mercer in the seventh inning.

Baez acknowledged after the win it was a mistake and that a teammate talked to him about the display.

Hurdle questioned Baez's “respect for the game” on Thursday, and the flashy star brushed off those comments after the Pirates beat the Cubs.

Maddon praised his player for owning up to his mistake. He also said he didn't see the bat flip.

“I think most of the time when you hear commentary — or critical commentary — it's really pretty much self-evaluation,” Maddon said. “It's about what you believe. It's about your judgmental component. It reveals you more than the person you're talking about. I've always believed that. Whenever you want to be hypercritical of somebody, just understand you're pretty much revealing yourself and what your beliefs are.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me