ShareThis Page
Pirates

Pirates gain 2, lose 2 in minor-league phase of Rule 5 Draft

Jerry DiPaola
| Thursday, Dec. 13, 2018, 1:15 p.m.
PNC Park
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
PNC Park

The Pirates selected two players and lost two others Thursday in the minor-league phase of the Rule 5 Draft during the last day of baseball’s Winter Meetings in Las Vegas. The team did nothing in the major-league portion of the draft.

Chosen were left fielder Randolph Gassaway off the Baltimore Orioles’ roster and right-handed pitcher Winston Nicacio from the St. Louis Cardinals. The Pirates lost Altoona’s Jordan George to the Chicago White Sox and catcher Rafelin Lorenzo to the Chicago Cubs.

Gassaway, 23, split time last season with two Single-A teams in the Orioles’ system, hitting a combined .268 with six home runs and 43 RBI. He was the Orioles’ 16th-round selection in the 2013 MLB Draft. Nicacio, 21, worked 68⅔ innings for two Single-A teams, striking out 60 and walking 38 while recording a 4-3 record, 4.72 ERA and 1.413 WHIP.

George, 26, hit .263 with five home runs and 43 RBIs in Double-A Altoona last season. He played left field and right field, first base and third base while also serving as a designated hitter. George was the Pirates’ 35th-round selection in the 2015 MLB Draft.

This was the second consecutive season Lorenzo, 21, was chosen in the Rule 5 Draft. He went from the Tampa Bay Rays to the Pirates last year.

During the 2018 season, he played for the Gulf Coast/RookieLeague Pirates and the Single-A West Virginia Power, hitting a combined .307 with four home runs and 16 RBIs in 33 games.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry at jdipaola@tribweb.com or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me