ShareThis Page

MLB notebook: Giants stand pat with World Series roster

| Wednesday, Oct. 24, 2012, 8:16 p.m.
Twins closer Matt Capps (left), pictured with former Pirates teammate Ryan Doumit while pitching for the Twins, was designated for assignment Wednesday, Oct. 24, 2012.
Twins closer Matt Capps (left), pictured with former Pirates teammate Ryan Doumit while pitching for the Twins, was designated for assignment Wednesday, Oct. 24, 2012. AP

• The San Francisco Giants are sticking with the roster that got them to the World Series. San Francisco set its 25-man roster against the Detroit Tigers hours before Game 1 on Wednesday night. The Giants are carrying the same 12 pitchers and 13 positions players as they had in the NL Division and Championship series.

• The Minnesota Twins said they will decline their $6 million contract option on right-handed reliever Matt Capps, which will make him eligible for free agency. The Twins said they told Capps, a former Pirates closer, they'll pay him a $250,000 buyout instead of bringing him back. Capps had 45 saves over 2½ seasons in Minnesota.

• The Seattle Mariners declined to pick up the option for 2013 on catcher Miguel Olivo, which will make him a free agent after the World Series. He played in 87 games this season and hit .222 with 12 home runs and 29 RBI.

• The Chicago Cubs claimed right-handed pitcher Carlos Gutierrez off waivers from the Minnesota Twins and designated catcher Anthony Recker for assignment.

• Major League Baseball dismissed a report that the Dodgers could open the 2014 season in Australia. Australian promoters told the Sydney Morning Herald they were working on a deal that could have the Dodgers open with a three-game series against the Arizona Diamondbacks at the Sydney Cricket Ground.

• The Royals promoted minor league hitting coordinator Jack Maloof to major league hitting coach and Andre David to assistant hitting coach. The two of them replace Kevin Seitzer, whose contract was not renewed.

— AP

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me