Pitt basketball picked 10th in preseason ACC poll | TribLIVE.com
Pitt

Pitt basketball picked 10th in preseason ACC poll

Jerry DiPaola
1790218_web1_ptr-JeffCapel-081719
Greg Macafee | Tribune-Review
Pitt basketball coach Jeff Capel’s team is predicted to finish 10th in the ACC in 2019-20.

After finishing 14-19 with only three ACC victories in coach Jeff Capel’s first year, Pitt has been picked to finish 10th in the 15-team conference this season, according to preseason media rankings released Thursday.

Four starters return for Pitt, including Xavier Johnson (15.5 points per game), Trey McGowens (11.6), Au’Diese Toney and Terrell Brown. Johnson was named to the All-ACC Freshman team last season while setting seven Pitt freshman records.

Duke was picked to win the conference, with 51 first-place votes among the 111 ballots. North Carolina was second with 19, followed by Louisville (29) and defending national champion Virginia (12). Florida State, N.C. State, Notre Dame, Syracuse, Miami and Pitt complete the top 10. Clemson, Georgia Tech, Boston College, Virginia Tech and Wake Forest comprise the bottom five.

Duke and North Carolina had two players named to the preseason first and second teams. Duke’s Tre Jones and North Carolina’s Cole Anthony, also the preseason ACC Freshman of the Year, were named to the first team. Vernon Carey Jr. of Duke and Garrison Brooks of North Carolina were picked for the second team. The preseason Player of the Year is Louisville’s Jordan Nwora.

Get the latest news about Pitt football and all things Panthers athletics.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.