Pitt gets verbal commitment from offensive lineman Branson Taylor | TribLIVE.com
Pitt

Pitt gets verbal commitment from offensive lineman Branson Taylor

Jerry DiPaola
1585694_web1_gtr-PITTrecruiting-xxxxxx

Surrounded by his teammates on the Elyria Catholic football field, offensive lineman Branson Taylor made a verbal commitment to Pitt on Friday night.

Taylor, rated a three-star prospect by Rivals.com, is the second offensive lineman in Pitt’s class of 2020, joining Michael Statham of Baltimore. He is the second Pitt recruit from an Ohio high school.

After receiving 21 scholarship offers, Taylor, 6-foot-7, 285 pounds, reduced his choice to two schools – Pitt and West Virginia.

Taylor added a touch of drama to his announcement, setting up a table on the Elyria Catholic track with a banner and hat from each school. When Taylor made his choice, he was mobbed by his teammates.

He also had offers from Tennessee, Purdue, Michigan State, Indiana, Syracuse, Rutgers, Iowa State, Missouri, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisville, Minnesota and Maryland.

Pitt has commitments from 17 prospects four months before signing day.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.