ShareThis Page
Pitt has time for a reversal of fortune |

Pitt has time for a reversal of fortune

Jerry DiPaola
| Friday, February 8, 2019 8:32 a.m

Pitt-Wake Forest

Perhaps the cynics among Pitt basketball fans will find this hard to believe, but there’s still time — and resources — to salvage the season.

With eight games remaining, starting Saturday at Petersen Events Center against slumping N.C. State, Pitt should be competitive in most games. The only ranked teams on the schedule are No. 3 Virginia and No. 11 Virginia Tech.

Of course, the reality is Pitt (12-11, 2-8) is tied for last place in the ACC with Notre Dame (12-11, 2-8), Miami (10-12, 2-8) and Wake Forest (9-13, 2-8). But Pitt plays the Irish and the ’Canes later this month, plus Boston College (11-10, 2-7), after an overtime loss Tuesday at Wake Forest.

All those teams are struggling. The Panthers can win them all, but they also can lose them all.

Here are three thoughts as Pitt approaches the home stretch of Jeff Capel’s first season:

1. Don’t be fooled by N.C. State

The Wolfpack were ranked 15th by the Associated Press when Pitt lost 86-80 in Raleigh, N.C. At one time, they were 13-1.

But hard times are following N.C. State, too. After scoring 24 points in a 23-point loss to Virginia Tech, the Wolfpack recovered to put up 96 while allowing 113 to North Carolina three days later.

Capel called the 24-point effort — a record low for an ACC team in the shot-clock era — “a big-time aberration.”

He pointed out N.C. State has been one of the better scoring teams in the conference (fifth in shooting percentage at 47.3), even factoring those 45 misses in 54 attempts (2 of 28 from beyond the 3-point arc). In the eight games before the Virginia Tech game, N.C. State was averaging 76.2 points.

“They just had one of those nights. They had good looks. They just missed shots.”

Things returned to normal against North Carolina. The Wolfpack (16-7, 4-6) didn’t play much defense, but they shot 50 percent (37 of 74) from the field.

2. Johnson does a lot, can’t do it alone

Xavier Johnson is in the midst of one of the best freshman seasons in the history of Pitt basketball. He is averaging 17 points (eighth in the ACC) and is fourth on Pitt’s all-time freshman scoring list with 391 points. He needs 45 to break the all-time record of 435 set by Charles Smith in 1985.

The problem: Johnson is averaging 31.4 minutes.

“I have to do a better job of getting him a break periodically,” said Capel, pointing out Johnson played all but four seconds of the overtime loss to Wake Forest.

3. Pitt keeps fighting, fans keep coming

The atmosphere at the Pete is unlike what one might expect from a team that has two victories since Dec. 29.

If that continues Saturday, and the Panthers do what Capel demands — play more as a team less as individuals — Pitt has a chance to salvage the season and finish with a winning record.

“We’re trying to give hope,” Capel said, sending a message to fans. “We’re trying to give hope for the future. We’re trying to give hope for right now. We’re fighting, but we have to be able to do more than fight. We have to be able to close.”

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry at or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at or via Twitter .

AP Photo/Keith Srakocic
Pittsburgh head coach Jeff Capel yells to his team as they play against Duke during the second half of an NCAA college basketball game, Tuesday, Jan. 22, 2019, in Pittsburgh. Duke won 79-64. (AP Photo/Keith Srakocic)
Categories: Sports | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.