ShareThis Page
Pitt scores runs by the dozen in 26-2 victory against Maryland Eastern Shore | TribLIVE.com
Pitt

Pitt scores runs by the dozen in 26-2 victory against Maryland Eastern Shore

Jerry DiPaola
1100926_web1_gtr-PittAthletics

The hits — and more than two dozen runs — just kept on comin’ for the Pitt baseball team Wednesday afternoon.

The Panthers (16-28, 4-17 ACC) rapped out 21 hits — including a grand slam by David Yanni — in an historic 26-2 victory that completed a two-game sweep of Maryland Eastern Shore at Charles L. Cost Field.

The offensive outburst represented the most runs by a Pitt team since the Panthers scored 36 against IUP in 1953. A total of 13 batters collected at least one hit.

“Our guys have continued to bring out the energy, they’ve put in the work, and they are starting to reap the rewards of what they’ve put in,” coach Mike Bell said. “Today was about our offensive approach. We continued to get the big hits with two outs, but up and down the lineup we saw a lot of balls hit hard. “We saw guys running hard, 90 feet, playing the game the way it is meant to be played. “Again, defense was very solid, but (Wednesday) was all about the offense. It was going to be an offensive day the way the wind was blowing and our guys did a great job in putting together quality at-bats.”

The Panthers return to ACC play Friday for the start of a three-game series against Florida State. Bell is a former Florida State assistant.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.