Pitt scores second consecutive upset of nationally ranked North Carolina | TribLIVE.com

Pitt scores second consecutive upset of nationally ranked North Carolina

Jerry DiPaola

Pitt recorded its second consecutive stunning victory against a nationally ranked North Carolina team Friday, defeating the No. 11 Tar Heels, 7-1, at Charles L. Cost Field.

The game was the first between the teams since Pitt upset then-No. 5 North Carolina in the 2018 ACC Tournament.

“It was another outstanding team effort,” said Pitt coach Mike Bell, whose team has won seven of its past 10 games. “The pitching and defense were great from the start. Derek (West, winning pitcher) will tell you that he didn’t have his best stuff, but he gutted through a gutsy performance. Offensively, some big hits from Zach (Klapak), Connor (Perry), Bryce (O’Farrell) and Cole (MacLaren) really set the tone for us at the beginning of the game and allowed us to extend things late. Overall, it was a great team effort.”

West (3-2) earned his second consecutive ACC victory, working six innings, allowing one run, three hits and five walks while striking out six batters. Relief pitchers Chris Gomez and Chase Smith pitched the final three scoreless innings.

O’Farrell recorded three of Pitt’s 13 hits. Perry, Nico Popa and David Yanni each collected two.

North Carolina losing pitcher Tyler Baum had not lost since March 22.

The teams will conclude the series Saturday with a doubleheader starting at 1 p.m.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.