ShareThis Page
Pitt set to meet `deer in headlights’ Miami team |

Pitt set to meet `deer in headlights’ Miami team

Jerry DiPaola

When Pitt visits the Miami Hurricanes on Tuesday night in Coral Gables, Fla., it will meet a team just as desperate for a victory.

Miami (12-16, 4-12) has lost nine of its past 12, including a 30-point loss to Zion-less Duke on Saturday. “We were like a deer in the headlights,” coach Jim Larranaga said. “We froze.”

During the ACC coaches conference call Monday, Larranaga praised Pitt for having a deeper bench than his Hurricanes, which is true when Jared Wilson-Frame doesn’t start for the Panthers. Wilson-Frame has started 13 games this season, including the most recent two.

Nonetheless, Larranaga might not be far wrong in his assessment of his bench. In a 76-75 loss at Wake Forest last Tuesday, he played four starters 31 or more minutes and got a mere seven points from the only two reserves who received significant playing time.

The edge for Miami on Tuesday might be senior night in which three players will be recognized.

One of the seniors is 6-foot-10, 210-pound Ebuka Izundu, who nearly averages a double-double (10.9 points, 8.6 rebounds). His mother, Ifeoma, is flying in from Nigeria to see her son play basketball for the Hurricanes for the first time.

“It will be very, very special for him,” Larranaga said.

Get the latest news about Pitt basketball and all things Panthers athletics.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.