ShareThis Page
Pitt signs 4-star wing player to letter of intent | TribLIVE.com
Pitt

Pitt signs 4-star wing player to letter of intent

Jerry DiPaola
1041715_web1_gtr-PITTrecruiting-xxxxxx

Justin Champagnie, a 6-foot-5, four-star wing player from Brooklyn, N.Y., signed his letter of intent with Pitt after verbally committing to coach Jeff Capel in March.

“Justin is a high-energy player who competes hard on every possession,” Capel said in a statement. “He has the skill set and versatility to impact the game in a variety of ways and has shown the toughness to make winning plays.”

Champagnie, a second-team All-USA New York team selection, led Bishop Loughlin (23-4, 13-3) to a first-place finish in the BQ Diocesan League. Bishop Loughlin was ranked No. 11 in New York State Sportwriters Association (NYSSWA) team rankings.

Champagnie averaged 19.8 points, reaching at least 20 in 13 games.

He was a fifth-team Class AA NYSSWA all-state selection after averaging 16.1 points, 6.9 rebounds and 1.7 assists per game during the 2017-18 season. This season’s selections have not been announced, but he is ranked No. 111 nationally and No. 3 in the state of New York by 247Sports.

Last summer, he averaged 19.6 points, 5.9 rebounds and 2.3 blocks for New Heights on the AAU circuit.

Champagnie chose Pitt over scholarship offers from Cincinnati, Dayton, Rhode Island, Richmond, Rutgers, Saint Louis, Seton Hall, Temple and VCU.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.