Pitt, upcoming opponent Georgia Tech going through similar shooting woes | TribLIVE.com

Pitt, upcoming opponent Georgia Tech going through similar shooting woes

Jerry DiPaola
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt coach Jeff Capel’s Panthers are 12th in the 15-team ACC in field-goal percentage and have lost nine in a row.

When Jeff Capel was a sophomore at Duke 24 years ago, he hit 3-pointers at an impressive rate of 46 percent. In today’s game, that would put him among the top-10 long-range shooters in the NCAA.

Clearly, Pitt’s coach knows something about putting a basketball through the net. More than anything, he knows it’s a team effort.

“The screening, the cutting,” he said Monday on the ACC coaches teleconference. “The understanding that even if the play is not for you, your role in it is very important.”

It’s a concept that has eluded the Panthers and their upcoming hosts, the Georgia Tech Yellowjackets, at various points of the season.

Georgia Tech (11-15, 3-10), which will tip off against Pitt at 9 p.m. Wednesday, is last in the ACC in scoring (64.9 points per game) and 11th in shooting percentage at 43.1.

“Unfortunately, we’ve had a lid on the basket,” coach Josh Pastner said.

Pitt is 12th in field-goal percentage, hitting only 42.8 percent of its shots. The Panthers hit a low for the season last week at Boston College, shooting 29 percent while stretching their road losing streak to 21 games.

What’s interesting is Pitt has not been shy about putting up shots. It is sixth in the ACC in attempts (1,480).

“At times, I have been (pleased with his team’s shot selection),” Capel said. “At times, I haven’t. At times, we’ve gotten good looks and taken them and haven’t made them at the rate that we would like.”

Pitt often plays at a fast pace, with freshman point guard Xavier Johnson trying to use his speed to get ahead of the defense. When he’s unable to find a path to the basket — usually when the opponent is in a zone defense — the play sometimes turns into a missed jumper or a turnover. While handling the ball on most of Pitt’s trips downcourt, Johnson has 100 turnovers in 26 games.

Other times, Pitt has rushed shots, Capel said.

“We have to be a little more poised and little bit more disciplined,” he said. “Sometimes we get sped up. That’s what I mean about having the poise. Sometimes we’ve not taken good shots. That’s part of discipline and execution of everything.”

Capel said opponents often are backing their defense into the paint, cutting off lanes to the basket.

“We haven’t shot the ball well, so even in man, (the defense) is not out contesting as much. (It’s) trying to take away passes, really concentrating on Xavier and Trey (McGowens).

“They’ve really tried to close gaps and take away driving opportunities, stuff at the basket for those two guys, especially.”

Georgia Tech’s shooting problems go back almost a year when Josh Okogie declared for the NBA Draft after two seasons.

“It’s the reason we are in the position we are this year because we don’t have him, and we didn’t expect to lose him,” said Pastner, whose team has lost seven in a row. “When you got a guy who can score 20 a game and was a 3-star recruit and wasn’t one of the top 10 players in the state of Georgia and didn’t start on his AAU team, you weren’t expecting that he was going to be leaving after his sophomore year and be the 20th pick in the draft.

“It’s great for Josh, great for Georgia Tech. It just (stinks) for this season for us.”

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.