Pitt volleyball team sweeps No. 4 Penn State, 3-0 | TribLIVE.com
Pitt

Pitt volleyball team sweeps No. 4 Penn State, 3-0

Jerry DiPaola

Pitt’s volleyball team recorded a series of firsts Friday night in its 3-0 sweep of No. 4 Penn State, 25-17, 25-21 and 25-23.

With the sweep, the No. 6-ranked Panthers defeated Penn State for the first time since 1987, a span of 16 matches. Also, it was Pitt’s first victory at Penn State since 1980, and the sweep was the first against Penn State in a non-conference home match since 1986.

Pitt junior outside Kayla Lund led the offense with 14 kills, and Chinaza Ndee contributed 12 on .611 hitting, with one error. Redshirt senior Stephanie Williams was one kill from her fourth consecutive double-double, with nine kills and a team-high 10 digs.

The Panthers topped Penn State in kills (45-34), assists (43-33), service aces (4-2), digs (39-32) and blocks (8.5-6.5). Pitt held the Nittany Lions to .129 hitting for the night, while the Panthers hit .337.

Penn State, the highest-ranked team Pitt has defeated in program history. will get a rematch against Pitt at 1 p.m. Sunday at Petersen Events Center.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .


Categories: Sports | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.