Pitt basketball player Kyla Nelson has cancerous appendix tumor | TribLIVE.com
Pitt

Pitt basketball player Kyla Nelson has cancerous appendix tumor

1722914_web1_ptr-PittNelson-092619
AP
Pitt’s Kyla Nelson (13) moves the ball downcourt during the second half against Notre Dame on Thursday, Jan. 3, 2019.

Kyla Nelson, a junior guard on Pitt’s women’s basketball team, has a cancerous tumor on her appendix, the team announced Wednesday. She is set for surgery at the beginning of next month and expects to play this season.

Nelson was diagnosed with a neuroendocrine tumor when she was scheduled for an appendectomy Aug. 26.

“Cancer is a scary word for anyone,” Nelson said in a release. “I feel very lucky that the discovery was made at this early stage. I am grateful to be surrounded by such an amazing medical institution like Pitt and a team that is loving and supportive. My roommate has been great, and I also have a family I can lean heavily on, even with the long distance between us.”

Nelson, 21, is a native of Worthing, England.

A 5-foot-11 guard, Nelson was one of the top 3-point shooters in the ACC last season with a 40.4% field-goal percentage from behind the arc. She played in 30 games, starting eight, and averaged 6.0 points and 2.2 rebounds.

“Although this situation is very unfortunate for Kyla, we are happy to know the prognosis is positive and we were able to catch it so early,” coach Lance White said. “We have the utmost confidence in the UPMC medical team as well as our doctors and athletic trainers at Pitt.”

Categories: Sports | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.