Pitt women’s volleyball team 12th in preseason poll | TribLIVE.com

Pitt women’s volleyball team 12th in preseason poll

Michael Love
Jeff Gamza | Pitt Athletics
Pitt volleyball players celebrate during their victory over Louisville on Sunday, Oct. 21, 2018, at Fitzgerald Field House.

The Pitt women’s volleyball team, the two-time defending ACC champion, begins its season Aug. 30 with the Panther Challenge at Fitzgerald Field House, and the Panthers will head into that event with a No. 12 national ranking.

The American Volleyball Coaches Association released its Division I preseason poll Tuesday afternoon, and Pitt is the highest-rated ACC squad.

It is the highest preseason ranking in program history.

“Noting the amount of talent that we return this year, it’s great to be recognized by fellow coaches,” coach Dan Fisher said in a news release. “It’s a privilege for us to see these high expectations of our program.”

Pitt began last season’s run to the conference championship with a No. 20 preseason ranking.

The only other time the Panthers appeared in the AVCA preseason poll was in 1992 when they checked in at No. 25.

Pitt placed 14th in the final 2018 AVCA poll.

The Panthers return five of seven starters from the 2018 squad that finished in the second round of the NCAA Tournament with a 30-2 overall record and a 17-1 mark in ACC play.

Four ranked teams are on the Panthers’ schedule: No. 8 Penn State (Sept. 20 and 22), No. 11 Oregon (Sept. 11), No. 23 Cal Poly (Sept. 13) and No. 25 Louisville (Oct. 27 and Nov. 27).

Stanford is ranked No. 1, and it received 62 first-place votes. Nebraska picked up a first-place vote and is No. 2. The rest of the top 11 in front of Pitt is Minnesota, Texas, Wisconsin, Illinois, Kentucky, Penn State, BYU, Florida and Oregon.

Michael Love is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-856-7400 x8632, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.