Pitt’s ground game starts to find a groove against Ohio | TribLIVE.com

Pitt’s ground game starts to find a groove against Ohio

Jerry DiPaola
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt’s Vincent Davis gets past Ohio’s Ilyaas Motley Saturday, Sept. 7, 2019 at Heinz Field.

Making a passing reference to Pitt’s running game, Ohio coach Frank Solich defined it as accurately as anyone has so far this season.

“They were able to establish a little bit of a running game,” Solich said.

A little bit.

That’s certainly not what Pat Narduzzi wants or needs as the Pitt coach directs his team toward back-to-back games against No. 13 Penn State on Saturday and No. 17 Central Florida on Sept. 21. He’s a coach who wants to build his team around an elite running game.

In the 20-10 victory against Ohio, the ground game was clearly better than it was in the opener against Virginia when Panthers running backs A.J. Davis, Vincent Davis, V’Lique Carter and Todd Sibley Jr. totaled 62 yards on 18 carries.

Those numbers ballooned to 164 and 34 by the same quartet against Ohio, a less challenging opponent. But offensive coordinator Mark Whipple continued to lean the passing game for the important yards while Pitt was building a 17-3 halftime lead. The pass/run ratio settled on 38/36 at the end of the game, but it was 25/14 at halftime.

A.J. Davis was Pitt’s leading rusher with a career-high 89 yards on 13 carries. He also had 13 attempts last season against Albany but only for 46 yards. Clearly, he’s a better back than he was a year ago.

The final possession was impressive. Pitt ran off the last 7 minutes, 5 seconds of the game with 10 rushing attempts for 61 yards and an 8-yard pass to tight end Will Gragg. Vincent Davis, a 5-foot-8, 160-pound freshman, finished with 50 yards and a first-half touchdown on 12 carries. He was a workhorse at the end of the game, running the ball on seven consecutive plays.

“That’s nice to see,” center Jimmy Morrissey said. “It’s always nice when you finish with the ball in your hands and close the game out with your offense.”

Morrissey said he was encouraged “by bits and parts” of the offense.

“There’s a lot more we need to improve on. We’re not there yet,” he said. “Some drives were encouraging.

“We were communicating a lot better toward the end.”

It might not be a reach to say Pitt’s fortunes this season hinge on the development of the young offensive line and backfield. Good run blocking and adequate protection of the quarterback are cornerstones of any team’s offense. Pitt’s failures in those areas led to the loss to Virginia.

Narduzzi doesn’t seem to be in a hurry to name a lead running back.

Junior A.J. Davis, the most experienced of the group, has started the first two games. But freshman Vincent Davis seems destined to burn his redshirt. He had the second-most carries on the team.

“You know, our plan is every week, we’re going to look for the hot hand,” Narduzzi said.

Get the latest news about Pitt football and all things Panthers athletics.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.