Pitt notebook: Jimmy Morrissey gets Penn State talk started | TribLIVE.com
Pitt

Pitt notebook: Jimmy Morrissey gets Penn State talk started

Jerry DiPaola
1644104_web1_gtr-PittOhio23-090719
Pitt center Jimmy Morrissey snaps to quarterback Kenny Pickett against Ohio Saturday, Sept. 7, 2019 at Heinz Field.

Jimmy Morrissey is ready for Penn State. He’s a Pitt co-captain, so you have to believe his teammates feel the same.

After Pitt put away Ohio with a 20-10 victory Saturday at Heinz Field, the talk turned to Penn State, the opponent next Saturday in State College. It could be the last game between the two in-state rivals, who have met 99 times dating to 1893.

“I can’t wait,” said Morrissey, 21, a junior center and member of the university’s prestigious Blue-Gold Society for top students. “I’ve said it before. I’m from the eastern side of the state, Philly area. I know a lot of people who go there. Some of my closest friends go to Penn State.

“I don’t like them one bit. That’s pretty obvious. I mean, I play for Pitt. I’m excited to play them.”

He said his friends regularly remind him about Penn State’s victories in the past two games. “Yeah, of course, from all my friends,” he said.

When he was asked why he didn’t choose Penn State coming out of high school, he said, “I was a walk-on. I didn’t get offered anywhere.”

Then, he added, “I wouldn’t have gone there, anyway, if I had an offer.”

But he does lament the end of the series. “I don’t know why they wouldn’t continue it,” Morrissey said. “I don’t know if we’re not or they’re not or if it’s both sides. … But I think it’s great for the fans and great for the universities. It’s a good rivalry.”

Don’t blame Pickett

Morrissey was even more passionate in his defense of quarterback Kenny Pickett, who amassed a career high 321 passing yards a week after throwing two interceptions in the loss to Virginia.

Pickett took plenty of blame after the loss, and he said Saturday he has shut off his Twitter and Instagram accounts until at least the end of the season.

“It was our fault,” Morrissey said of the offensive line. “It wasn’t coach Borb’s (Dave Borbely, line coach) fault. It wasn’t (Mark) Whipple’s (first-year offensive coordinator) fault. It wasn’t Kenny’s fault. It was ours. We didn’t pick up certain games and twists and blitzes (by Virginia).

“We gave up 14 pressures as an offensive line. When you get hit 14 times, I don’t blame him for wanting to scramble. He’s getting hit that many times, what quarterback in the country can you ask to be confident in their O-line after that performance?

“It was more on us. We should have gotten more heat than he did.”

Morrissey said adjusting to a new offense takes time.

“It’s a new offense, first game of the year,” he said. “We hadn’t seen their film from this year. We knew they were going to throw some new stuff at us that we didn’t prepare for and we just didn’t adjust well enough to it last week.

“This week, we were a lot more prepared. We all talked about it. It was good that everybody recognized the problem.”

Coach Pat Narduzzi also tried to deflect some of the blame from his quarterback.

“Did he bounce back (against Ohio) or did everybody make some catches for him? No. 8 is a dang good football player. Dang good football player.”

Get the latest news about Pitt football and all things Panthers athletics.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.