Pitt’s Pat Narduzzi said there’s no time to steal signals, even if he wanted to try | TribLIVE.com

Pitt’s Pat Narduzzi said there’s no time to steal signals, even if he wanted to try

Jerry DiPaola
Pitt head coach Pat Narduzzi reacts during the Virginia game Saturday, Aug. 31, 2019 at Heinz Field.

When Penn State coach James Franklin said he changed play signals as soon as safety John Petrishen transferred from Penn State to Pitt, Pat Narduzzi smiled.

“I haven’t said anything about Eric Thatcher (Penn State’s assistant recruiting coordinator),” Pitt’s coach said Thursday. “He sat in (Pitt’s) defensive meeting rooms for two years.”

Thatcher played safety at Pitt under Walt Harris and Dave Wannstedt and was a defensive quality control coach for Narduzzi.

“I’m sure he’s a ball coach this week,” Narduzzi said, “trying to fill them in on what we do.”

Narduzzi admitted to levels of paranoia when it comes to protecting signals. Pitt uses tarps on the sideline when diagramming plays and picture boards that might or might not mean something specific about the next play.

But he said it’s difficult to steal signals during a game and relay the information to the players on the field.

“First of all, defensively, you can’t steal an offensive signal. There’s no time,” Narduzzi said. “We’re busy getting our own signals (in). Are we going to signal to our defense and then tell them what the offensive play is? Defensively, your hands are tied. You can’t steal signals.

“That’s me. Maybe I’m just a dumb football coach.”

Narduzzi said signal stealing can occur on offense because that side of the ball controls the tempo, but he said Pitt is innocent on that front, too. He said it’s easier just to run the play called by offensive coordinator Mark Whipple than to complicate things with another set of signals.

“Have you seen (Pitt quarterback) Kenny Pickett ever look to the sideline to get a second call?” Narduzzi said. “People who look to the sideline usually are the people who are stealing signals. People who don’t look to the sideline are just running a play.

“If you don’t look to the sideline, you’re not stealing signals. I can promise you. We haven’t stolen any signals because we don’t do that.”

He also said the play clock is a factor in keeping teams honest.

“It’s not like they give us two minutes to take a snap. If that was the case, maybe we could,” he said. “Maybe we’re just all not very good coaches and we haven’t been thieves.“

Pitt, actually, might have been the victim of a sign stealer in 1975. As the story goes, then-West Virginia defensive coordinator Chuck Klausing borrowed a 16mm camera from WTAE-TV, gave it to his son Tommy and told him to film Pitt’s game against Navy. Two weeks later, West Virginia defeated Pitt, 17-14, the only time the Mountaineers beat a Pitt team coached by either Johnny Majors or Jackie Sherrill.

Narduzzi probably never heard that story, but he insists signal stealing won’t decide the outcome of any of his games, no matter how pervasive it might be.

“If I had (Penn State’s) notebook sitting here,” he said, pointing to the conference table in front of him, “that’s not going to help me win a football game. I can promise you that.”

Get the latest news about Pitt football and all things Panthers athletics.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.