ShareThis Page
Podcast: Penguins can’t shake Chicago demons; what’s wrong with Derick Brassard? |
Breakfast With Benz

Podcast: Penguins can’t shake Chicago demons; what’s wrong with Derick Brassard?

Tim Benz
| Tuesday, January 8, 2019 6:45 a.m

In today’s “Breakfast with Benz” podcast, I’m joined by Brian Metzer of the Penguins Radio Network for our weekly hockey talk.

We discuss the Penguins’ surprising loss to the Blackhawks. The state of Derick Brassard’s game. Casey DeSmith’s goaltending. Tuesday night’s game against the Panthers.

Most importantly, we get into what Dan Potash may wear for 1970’s night and the prospect of a new Tool album … soon?

Tim Benz, Brian Metzer discuss Penguins’ loss to Chicago and more

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.