ShareThis Page
Point Park’s Shields is NAIA’s top athlete, again | TribLIVE.com
District College

Point Park’s Shields is NAIA’s top athlete, again

Bill Beckner
| Friday, March 8, 2019 2:04 p.m
855243_web1_ptr-Shields-072718
Point Park’s Anna Shields won a combined four NAIA national titles at the 2018 indoor and outdoor track and field championships.

What Anna Shields has done at Point Park will become legendary long after she graduates.

It will tough to forget her “run” of success.

Arguably the fastest woman in Pittsburgh for the duration of her college running career, Shields achieved elite status and stayed there. For the fifth time, she was voted the NAIA National Athlete of the Year, an award presented by the United States Track & Field and Cross Country Coaches Association.

She also was named NAIA Women’s Indoor Track National Athlete of the Year by the USTFCCCA.

Shields has been tabbed the NAIA’s top athlete for the 2017 and ‘18 outdoor seasons, the ‘18 cross country season and now the ‘18 and ‘19 indoor campaigns.

A multi-time All-American, Shields won a pair of national titles last weekend, breaking the NAIA record in the 1,000-meters with a time of 2 minutes, 44.35 seconds and ran the mile in an above-standard 4:37.73. She also ran a leg of the distance medley relay that took second. Shields’ leg of the race clocked in 4:41.

The Torrington, Conn. native qualified for the national meet in five events but competed in just the 1,000 and mile.

She finished the season with the fastest time in four events: 600 meters (1:33.76), 800 meters (2:07.51), 1,000 (2:42.51) and mile (4:37.73). She had the second-fastest time in the 3,000 meters (9:39.19).

Bill Beckner Jr. is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bill by email at bbeckner@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | College-District
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.