ShareThis Page
Pro Wrestling

2 former pro wrestlers sue WWE over concussions

| Tuesday, Jan. 20, 2015, 1:45 p.m.

PHILADELPHIA — Two former professional wrestlers accuse the WWE of “selling violence” and ignoring concussions they say left them with serious brain injuries.

The men have filed a potential class-action lawsuit in federal court in Philadelphia. That's where a judge is weighing a similar case that could yield a $1 billion settlement for thousands of former NFL players.

The WWE plaintiffs are Evan Singleton of Lancaster and Vito Lograsso of Coatesville.

The suit says Singleton performed under the name Adam Mercer from 2012-2013 and is now disabled due to brain trauma.

The lawsuit says Lograsso suffers from migraines, memory loss, depression and deafness after nearly a decade with the WWE.

The Stamford, Conn.-based company did not immediately return a call for comment.

The lawsuit seeks unspecified economic damages and medical monitoring.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me