Public Enemy No. 6: Browns’ Mayfield knows he’s a target | TribLIVE.com
NFL

Public Enemy No. 6: Browns’ Mayfield knows he’s a target

Associated Press
1785982_web1_1777711-8c64e3afe6f0495b94dcb2f5f6baaf44
AP
Browns quarterback Baker Mayfield passes as San Francisco 49ers defensive end Nick Bosa applies pressure during the first half in Santa Clara, Calif., Monday, Oct. 7, 2019.

BEREA, Ohio — Baker Mayfield’s brash past behavior and celebrity status make him a wanted man.

Around the NFL, he’s Public Enemy No. 6.

Whether because of jealousy or simply wanting to bring him down, Cleveland’s quarterback is being targeted by defenders.

“It’s one of those things that people, I think they see Baker’s name. I think they see him in the media. I think they see some of his quotes and things of that nature, and they want a piece of him,” said Browns left guard Joel Bitonio. “And it’s one of those things that we’re going to expect and we’re ready for.”

This week, Mayfield found himself in the crosshairs of San Francisco’s Nick Bosa and Richard Sherman, both of whom took different runs at the charismatic second-year quarterback with a reputation for speaking his mind and strutting around on the field.

Bosa roughed up Mayfield and mocked him during the 49ers’ 31-3 blowout of the Browns on Monday night while Sherman blitzed him afterward, saying the 24-year-old star disrespected him by not shaking the outspoken cornerback’s hand before the pregame coin toss.

On Wednesday, after video surfaced of Mayfield shaking hands with Sherman and all the 49ers, the three-time All-Pro backpedaled.

“It’s definitely my bad,” Sherman said during an appearance on The Pat McAfee Show. “… I’ll probably reach out to him via text or social media to actually get ahold of him and talk to him in person, I mean on the phone. Yeah, he definitely deserves an apology, and that’s my bad on that.”

Just off the practice field, Mayfield said he had not yet heard from Sherman.

“I respect him and who he is as a player,” Mayfield said. “He’s a great player and has been for a while, and in no way did I mean anything like that.”

Mayfield even found a way to laugh off the incident by joking he was vindicated.

“I know what I did. That’s the one time the camera and something recording me has gone in my favor,” he cracked.

Sherman tried to pin the blame on media coverage.

“I’ve said my piece about it. I’m going to have a conversation with him, and then I’m going to be done with it,” he said after the 49ers worked out. “It’s just funny it got so big. Man, I thought football is what they watch. I guess it’s the soap opera.”

Mayfield threw two interceptions — one by Sherman in the first quarter — and had the worst game of his young pro career against the 49ers. He didn’t throw a touchdown pass for the first time 18 starts, completed 8 of 22 passes, got sacked four times and was constantly running from pressure.

Bosa, it turns out, was looking to settle a college score with Mayfield.

After the former Ohio State star forced Mayfield into a rushed throw late in the second quarter, he celebrated by pretending to wave and plant a flag on the field. Bosa was mimicking Mayfield, who led Oklahoma to a win over the Buckeyes in 2017 and then famously ran to midfield planted a red-and-white OU flag, angering the school’s fans and players.

Categories: Sports | NFL
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.