ShareThis Page
Quiet RJ Barrett shines in Zion Williamson’s shadow for No. 1 Duke | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World Sports

Quiet RJ Barrett shines in Zion Williamson’s shadow for No. 1 Duke

Associated Press
| Tuesday, February 19, 2019 1:30 a.m
773593_web1_773593-bb3c0fa886f244e8b488cea86be26aca
Duke’s RJ Barrett is defended by Boston College’s Ky Bowman during the second half Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2019. Barrett averages 22.7 points for the Blue Devils but is happy staying out of the spotlight thanks to Zion Williamson’s stardom.

DURHAM, N.C. — RJ Barrett leads the ACC in scoring. He just recorded Duke’s first triple-double in 13 years.

And — as long as his roommate Zion Williamson is still around — he won’t have top billing for the top-ranked Blue Devils.

That’s just fine with Barrett.

“Him getting attention draws more attention to us, too,” Barrett said Tuesday.

While Williamson has been good for a highlight-reel play in virtually every game, the less-flashy Barrett consistently has been productive for first-place Duke (23-2, 11-1) entering its rivalry matchup Wednesday night with No. 8 North Carolina (20-5, 10-2).

“We can’t just keep our eye on Superman,” UNC coach Roy Williams said, referring to Williamson.

Barrett and Williamson are clearly the biggest stars on the highest-profile team in the country. Most mock drafts have both being selected early in the NBA Draft — should they turn pro after the season.

So it’s not that Barrett is being ignored or overlooked, but it’s more about how dominant Williamson’s presence is across the entirety of college basketball.

The gregarious, highly quotable Williamson routinely is sought out after games, and he regularly brings along walk-on Mike Buckmire as his sidekick and teases Barrett for the low grades he often gives Williamson’s dunks.

In contrast, the low-key Barrett typically prefers to let his play speak for itself.

“I think we feed off each other,” Barrett said.

He played for the Canadian national team and came to Duke a year early after reclassifying, and coach Mike Krzyzewski believes his experiences have helped him handle the attention.

“There’s a maturity and a comfort level with not taking it seriously, but understanding that if you’re going to be good, that’s a good part of what you’re doing, and not to let it become pressure,” Krzyzewski said.

On the court, Duke generally knows what it’s going to get each game from Barrett because the team’s position-less offense frequently runs through him. That means lots of shots — and lots of points.

His average of 22.7 points is 0.3 of a point better than Williamson’s. He’s reached double figures in all 25 games of his college career, never has finished with fewer than 13 points and has scored at least 20 in all but seven games.

Yet Barrett also isn’t exactly the most efficient player on the roster.

He’s taken 462 shots this season, and his per-game average of 18.48 is the highest in the ACC and the seventh-highest in Division I. He’s put up at least 12 shots in every game and had 30 attempts in the overtime loss to Syracuse — while also taking over some point guard responsibilities after Tre Jones injured his shoulder early in that game. He has made more than half his shots in just six games.

Barrett is a slasher who is at his best attacking the rim or hitting mid-range jumpers — roughly two-thirds of his shots come from inside the arc — but he puts up enough 3-pointers to keep defenses honest.

A 33 percent shooter from long range, Barrett hit a season-best 6 of 10 from 3-point range two weeks ago in a road victory over No. 3 Virginia.

And yet he’s versatile enough to record the school’s first triple-double since 2006, finishing with 23 points, 11 rebounds and 10 assists last week against North Carolina State after coming close to one twice before.

North Carolina guard Kenny Williams summed the challenges Barrett brings with his own scouting report.

“I think you’ve got to keep him out of the lane,” Williams said. “He can shoot the ball. I think he showed that against Virginia, but he does most of his damage in the paint and in the lane, and you’ve got to keep him, you’ve just got to do your best to keep him out of the lane and not let him attack you. You can’t let him get into a rhythm, because once he gets into a rhythm, he’s definitely tough to guard.”

Categories: Sports | US-World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.