Quietly subpar season from Justin Schultz didn’t help Penguins’ cause | TribLIVE.com
Penguins/NHL

Quietly subpar season from Justin Schultz didn’t help Penguins’ cause

Jonathan Bombulie
1167890_web1_1141801772
Getty
Anthony Beauvillier of the New York Islanders is checked into the boards by Justin Schultz of the Pittsburgh Penguins in Game 1 of an Eastern Conference first-round playoff series April 10, 2019 in Uniondale, New York.

Most of the players who had a bad year for the Pittsburgh Penguins this season did so at a high volume. The struggles of Evgeni Malkin, Phil Kessel and Patric Hornqvist, for instance, were loud.

Justin Schultz, on the other hand, had a bad year quietly.

Perhaps it’s because he spent much of the season on the injured list with a broken leg.

Perhaps it’s because his stat line when he was on the ice – 2 goals, 13 assists and an even plus-minus rating in 29 games – was nothing remarkable. It doesn’t compare favorably to his 27 points and plus-22 rating from the season before, but it wasn’t alarming.

It only requires a cursory look beyond those numbers, however, to find some trouble.

When Schultz was on the ice at five on five this season, the Penguins had 45.2% of the shots and 45.3% of the shot attempts. Both figures ranked 11th among the 12 defensemen the team used. Both figures were by far the worst of his four-year tenure with the Penguins.

It would be easy to chalk up Schultz’s woes to the fact that he and frequent defense partner Jack Johnson did not fare well as a pair, but that wouldn’t be entirely accurate. Schultz’s numbers with and without Johnson are very similar.

In 383 minutes with Johnson at five on five, Schultz’s on-ice shot-attempt percentage was 45.0%. In 107 minutes without him, it was 46.3%.

With Johnson, the Penguins outscored their opponents 16-11 when Schultz was on the ice five on five. Without him, the Penguins were outscored 5-3 with Schultz on the ice.

Besides, the more pertinent reason for Schultz’s struggles might be more obvious than all that: It’s hard for a player to simply shake off a broken leg like nothing ever happened once he returns to the lineup.

He suffered the injury Oct. 13. He didn’t play again until Feb. 16.

“It wasn’t easy, obviously missing a large portion of the season,” Schultz said. “It’s not easy coming back. But I thought the trainers and everyone did a good job of getting me ready. I felt pretty good. Obviously it’s a big summer for me, getting back to, for sure, 100 percent.”

Under normal circumstances, Schultz might be a likely trade candidate as the Penguins are looking to shed salary and change up the roster this offseason. He is, after all, entering the final year of a contract that pays him $5.5 million annually.

It’s probable, though, that he will perform better the further removed he is from his injury. The Penguins might be better off benefitting from that improvement than letting another team reap the rewards.

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all offseason long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.