Raiders coach Jon Gruden after brother Jay fired: ‘Welcome to the club, bro’ |

Raiders coach Jon Gruden after brother Jay fired: ‘Welcome to the club, bro’

Frank Carnevale
Oakland Raiders head coach Jon Gruden encourages his team as they prepare for an NFL football game against the Chicago Bears at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, Sunday, Oct. 6, 2019, in London.

Oakland Raiders head coach Jon Gruden was asked Tuesday about his brother Jay’s firing as coach of the Washington Redskins. He mentioned his own firing, as well as his fathers and added, “welcome to the club, bro.”

Jon Gruden did not speculate on whether Jay might join his staff, according to ESPN.

But he did share some thoughts.

“I’m obviously very disappointed for my brother,” Gruden said during his weekly media conference. “It was a long night, last couple of nights. He worked hard. Got a lot of respect for my brother. Obviously, disappointed for him getting fired.

“My dad’s been fired,” Gruden added. “I’ve been fired. Jay’s been fired and … welcome to the club, bro.”

Jay Gruden was dismissed from the Redskins on Monday morning after a winless 0-5 start to the season. Jay was with the team for six seasons and amassed a 35-49-1 record with one playoff appearance, a Wild Card game loss in 2015.

Jon Gruden is in the second season of his second stint with the Raiders. He was fired by the Tampa Bay Buccaneers in 2008 (after landing there in a trade from Oakland). Jon did win a Super Bowl with the Bucs. This season he has the Raiders off to a 3-2 start.

Jim Gruden, father to Jon and Jay, was an assistant coach at Indiana University (1973–77) and at the University of Notre Dame (1978–80).

Frank Carnevale is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Frank via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | NFL
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.