Ravens’ 3 best, 3 worst draft picks of the past 5 years | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Ravens’ 3 best, 3 worst draft picks of the past 5 years

Chris Adamski
1047676_web1_AP_19008176210491
1047676_web1_ptr-zadariussmith-041919
Tribune-Review
Steelers tackle Marcus Gilbert fends off Ravens linebacker Za’Darius Smith during the second quarter Sunday, Dec. 27, 2015, at M&T Bank Stadium in Baltimore.

Editor’s note: While much of the Trib’s coverage leading up to Thursday’s start of the NFL Draft will focus on the Pittsburgh Steelers, we also will look at the league at large. Particularly, the Steelers’ divisional rivals. Between April 18-20, we’ll examine each of the three best and three worst picks by AFC North teams over the past five years.

Ozzie Newsome deservedly earned a reputation as one of the NFL’s better personnel men. A strong late-season run last season allowed him to avoid retiring from the Baltimore Ravens on a down note.

The Ravens avoided their first five-year stretch without a playoff berth in franchise history by running down the Steelers in November and December for the AFC North title last season. But even with that 10-6 finish, Baltimore is a pedestrian 50-46 with just one playoff victory over the past six seasons.

Is that a result in a dropoff in their drafting? Perhaps, at least in part. There doesn’t seem to be a star they’ve picked over the past five drafts. But there aren’t too many duds, either. Take a look:

Three best

1. Za’Darius Smith, OLB, 2015, 122rd overall

If the four-year, $66 million contract the Green Bay Packers gave Smith last month is any indication, he far outplayed his fourth-round draft stature. Smith had 8½ sacks last season, his first full campaign as a featured part of the Ravens defense.

2. Matt Judon, OLB, 2016, 146th overall

Part of the Ravens’ decision to allow Smith to leave was tied to the emergence of Judon, who has 15 sacks over the past two seasons and could be poised to take a star turn now that Smith and Terrell Suggs have moved on from Baltimore.

3. Orlando Brown, OT, 2018, 83rd overall

The mammoth Brown was considered a lock as a first-round pick until he had what will probably go down as one of the worst combine performances in the event’s history. He slipped to the third round, where the Ravens scooped him up and reaped immediate dividends when he became a quality right tackle as a rookie.

Three worst

1. Breshad Perriman, WR, 2015, 26th overall

The son of a former NFL receiver, Perriman was viewed across the league as a sure-fire first-round pick. If the Ravens didn’t take him, someone else probably would have. But he produced just 43 catches in 27 games for Baltimore and has joined his third team in five seasons.

2. Kamalei Correa, OLB, 2016, 42nd overall

The Ravens turned this mid-second-round pick into a sixth-round pick two years later when it became apparent Correa would not make the 53-man roster last summer, and they traded him to Tennessee. Correa had just 19 tackles and zero sacks in 25 games for the Ravens in 2016-17.

3. Maxx Williams, TE, 2015, 55th overall

Though injuries are part of Williams’ story, the Ravens surely envisioned more than three touchdowns and 63 catches over the four seasons of his rookie contract. Most telling, Williams remains unsigned in late April after entering free agency last month at age 24.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.