Earl Thomas reportedly fined for hit on Steelers’ Mason Rudolph | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Earl Thomas reportedly fined for hit on Steelers’ Mason Rudolph

Chris Adamski
1799381_web1_AP_19279687428751
AP
Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Mason Rudolph is hit by Baltimore Ravens free safety Earl Thomas, left, and cornerback Brandon Carr during the second half of last week’s game.

Baltimore Ravens safety Earl Thomas was fined more than $21,000 for the hit on Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Mason Rudolph during last week’s game that left Rudolph with a concussion.

The fine was reported by ESPN. Levied fines typically are not confirmed until the Saturday following a week’s games. The collectively bargained fine schedule for the league mandates a $21,056 fine for a first offense of roughing the passer. That is what Thomas was penalized for during the game. The league could have considered a $28,075 fine for “Impermissible Use of the Helmet.”

Officials did not appear to throw a flag on the play until after Rudolph had lied on the turf unconscious.

Thomas told ESPN he reached out and tried to speak with Rudolph this week.

“I wanted to him to know that I didn’t do it on purpose,” Thomas said, according to ESPN. “That’s all I wanted him to know.”

Rudolph spent the week in the NFL’s concussion protocol and was limited in practice. He was to be evaluated by an independent neurologist Saturday who could have cleared him to play Sunday in a game at the Los Angeles Chargers.

But the Steelers, because of the extra practice reps that undrafted rookie Devlin Hodges got this week, ruled Rudolph out for Sunday’s game.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.