ShareThis Page
Recording: Sean Miller involved in paying Deandre Ayton $10K monthly | TribLIVE.com
News

Recording: Sean Miller involved in paying Deandre Ayton $10K monthly

Associated Press
1100968_web1_AP_19072769853733
AP
Arizona’s Sean Miller, center, reacts after a play against Southern Cal in the first round of the Pac-12 tournament Wednesday, March 13, 2019, in Las Vegas.

NEW YORK — A former aspiring business manager for NBA players took the witness stand at a college basketball bribery trial Wednesday to deny charges that he paid off coaches at major programs to get their help in landing clients with potential for lucrative pro contracts.

“I never paid a coach with the intent of bribing or influencing anyone,” Christian Dawkins told a jury in federal court in Manhattan.

Dawkins, 26, described resisting pressure from FBI agents posing as investors in his fledging sports management company to make payouts to coaches at schools including the Arizona, Southern Cal, Creighton and Texas Christian. At one point during the testimony, the defense played a secret recording where Dawkins complains to one of the undercovers that they shouldn’t “be Santa Claus and just give people money,” saying the funds would be better spent at strip clubs.

Earlier Wednesday, the government ended its case by playing other wiretap recordings of Dawkins. On one 2017 call, then-Arizona assistant coach Emanuel “Book” Richardson tells Dawkins that head coach Sean Miller (Blackhawk, Pitt) was involved in a deal to pay eventual No. 1 NBA draft pick Deandre Ayton $10,000 a month to play for the Wildcats.

There was no immediate comment Wednesday from officials at Arizona. Miller, who remains the coach at Arizona, repeatedly has declined to discuss the investigation.

Dawkins was testifying in his own defense at a federal trial where he and his co-defendant, amateur coach Merl Code, have pleaded not guilty to charges accusing them of conspiring to bribe coaches in 2017 while trying to get Dawkins’ company off the ground.

Asked specifically about an alleged $2,500 bribe made on behalf of an NBA agent to then-South Carolina assistant coach Lamont Evans, Dawkins told the jury the money instead was meant to cover the expenses of the family of basketball player P.J. Dozier, a top recruit at the time.

Dawkins insisted it wouldn’t make sense to bribe coaches because they carry little influence over players’ decisions on who to hire as agents and business managers.

“From a business perspective, it doesn’t make sense,” he said. “Lamont Evans couldn’t do anything for us, so there was no reason to pay him.”

Dawkins freely admitted that while working for the agent prior to launching his own firm, he regularly doled out cash to family members of standout prospects — “fathers, mothers, sisters, brothers” acting as player “handlers” — in violation of NCAA rules. He said in the “ferocious” competition to sign top talent, it was a price of doing business.

“I have nothing to hide from that standpoint,” he said. “Everybody was paying players.”

Dawkins was to return to the witness stand Thursday for cross-examination.

Evans and Richardson have pleaded guilty to bribery conspiracy charges and are awaiting sentencing.

Categories: Sports
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.