Report: Antonio Brown sent ‘intimidating’ texts to accuser |

Report: Antonio Brown sent ‘intimidating’ texts to accuser

Renatta Signorini

A woman who alleges former Steelers wide receiver Antonio Brown made an unwanted sexual advance toward her said she received what she described as intimidating text messages from a number associated with Brown, according to Sports Illustrated.

Sports Illustrated published an article this week detailing a few allegations against Brown, ranging from unpaid debts to sexual misconduct involving the woman. In a follow-up article Thursday, the news outlet reported that the artist’s attorney sent a letter to the NFL reporting that she was part of a text message group that included messages from a number Brown previously gave her.

The letter included screen shots of the messages. The person sending the messages suggested the woman, who is an artist, was looking for money. Brown asked others involved in the group text to look into the artist’s background.

The woman also contends she was never paid for painting a mural of Brown at his home.

The artist told Sports Illustrated that, while she was painting a mural of Brown, he was naked at one point when he approached her, holding a small towel over his genitals. Brown has denied the allegations.


He was released by the Oakland Raiders earlier this month and agreed to a contract with the New England Patriots the same day.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.