Report: A’s bench coach to interview with Pirates |

Report: A’s bench coach to interview with Pirates

Jerry DiPaola
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates general manager Neal Huntington answers question during a press conference on June 11, 2019, at PNC Park.

The Pittsburgh Pirates’ search for a manager to replace Clint Hurdle will bring Neal Huntington face-to-face with Ryan Christenson, bench coach for the Oakland A’s, the San Francisco Chronicle reported.

Christenson, 45, was a major league outfielder for the A’s, Arizona Diamondbacks, Milwaukee Brewers and Texas Rangers from 1998-2003.

The Pirates might be interested in Christenson’s connection to the small-market A’s, who won 97 games in each of the past two seasons with payrolls ranked 28th and 25th, respectively.

Christenson, who has been viewed as a possible successor to 58-year-old A’s manager Bob Melvin, began a minor-league managerial career in the Oakland farm system in 2013 with the Single-A Beloit Snappers and the Single-A Advanced Stockton Ports.

Promoted to the Double-A Midland RockHounds in 2015 and ‘16, he led the team to consecutive Texas League championships and was named manager of the year in 2016. He managed the Triple-A Nashville Sounds in 2017 before joining the A’s the following year.

The A’s coaching staff is drawing interest after two consecutive trips to the playoffs. Quality control coach Mark Kotsay has interviewed for the San Francisco Giants’ managerial opening, and third-base coach Matt Williams has signed a three-year contract to manage the Kia Tigers of the KBO League in Korea.

Love baseball? Stay up-to-date with the latest Pittsburgh Pirates news.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pirates
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.