Report: Steelers’ Ben Roethlisberger fined $5K for wearing Apple Watch on sideline |

Report: Steelers’ Ben Roethlisberger fined $5K for wearing Apple Watch on sideline

Joe Rutter
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger cruises the sideline during the Bengals game Monday, Sept. 30, 2019 at Heinz Field.

Don’t ask Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger to tell you the time, especially not when he is standing on the sideline on game day at Heinz Field.

According to an ESPN report, which cited an unnamed source, Roethlisberger was fined $5,000 by the NFL because he wore an Apple Watch on the sideline during the Steelers’ game on Monday night against the Cincinnati Bengals.

The report said Roethlisberger is “livid” about the fine because he was given no advance notice that wearing an Apple Watch was a violation, either of the NFL’s uniform policy or the league rule that prohibits electronic devices that can transmit messages.

Roethlisberger wore the device on his left wrist because his right arm was bandaged from his recent surgery.

Roethlisberger, who is on injured reserve after undergoing season-ending elbow surgery, wore the watch on his left wrist while watching the Steelers defeat the Bengals, 27-3, for their first win of the season.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.