ShareThis Page
Restricted free agents Finney, Grimble reportedly receive contract tenders |

Restricted free agents Finney, Grimble reportedly receive contract tenders

Joe Rutter
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Steelers’ B.J. Finney has made nine starts in 43 career games with the Steelers.

The Pittsburgh Steelers took steps toward retaining restricted free agents B.J. Finney and Xavier Grimble when they reportedly made tenders to each player Wednesday.

According to separate NFL Network reports, the Steelers offered Finney, a 27-year-old guard/center, a $3.095 million second-round tender. Any team can try to sign Finney but would lose a second-round draft pick in the Steelers don’t match the offer.

By extending that second-round tender to Finney, the Steelers could be prepared to part ways with 10-year veteran Ramon Foster, who will be an unrestricted free agent. Finney has made nine starts on the interior offensive line in 43 career games with the Steelers.

Grimble, 26, was extended an original-round tender worth $2.025 million. The Steelers would receive no compensation if Grimble signs with another team and they decline to match the offer. Retaining Grimble would give the Steelers a second veteran tight end on the roster. Backup Jesse James is an unrestricted free agent and is expected to test the market.

Grimble had six catches for 86 yards while appearing in all 16 games last season. He was best remembered for his fumble at the goal line that ruled out of the end zone for a touchback in a November loss at Denver.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.