Retired agent: Steelers can go after some of Antonio Brown’s money |

Retired agent: Steelers can go after some of Antonio Brown’s money

Joe Rutter
Getty Images
Antonio Brown (84) of the Pittsburgh Steelers celebrates a touchdown during the second half against the New Orleans Saints at the Mercedes-Benz Superdome on December 23, 2018 in New Orleans.
Steelers wide receiver Antonio Brown pulls in a pass reception in front of Saints cornerback Marshon Lattimore in the second half Sunday, Dec. 23, 2018.

By skipping the walkthrough last Saturday and a meeting at the team hotel later that night, did Pittsburgh Steelers wide receiver Antonio Brown violate the terms of his contract, giving the team a chance to withhold his game check and possibly recoup a portion of his signing bonus?

A retired NFL agent thinks the Steelers have a legitimate case if they wish to pursue it because Brown displayed conduct detrimental to the team.

“When you sign an NFL contract, you promise to abide by all conditions of it,” said Ralph Cindrich, a Pittsburgh-based lawyer and former NFL player. “If you breach it, there is a liability, and I think there is no question that he breached it.”

Brown did not practice in the days leading up to the season finale against the Cincinnati Bengals with what coach Mike Tomlin described as a knee injury after he initially gave the wide receiver one day off as a “coach’s decision.”

According to Tomlin, Brown never attended a scheduled MRI last Friday and did not return phone calls that night or Saturday. Brown reported to Heinz Field on Sunday only to be told by Tomlin he would not be playing. Brown reportedly left the venue at halftime of the Steelers’ 16-13 victory.

Brown also did not attend a team meeting Monday morning at UPMC Rooney Sports Complex.

“It would go through a grievance procedure, but I think the Steelers would win,” Cindrich said. “He went AWOL. He didn’t show up, and they have a right to withhold on that. Not showing up is enough, in my opinion, for the Steelers to say enough is enough and we’re not paying you.”

Because the Steelers converted all but $915,000 into a signing bonus last year when they restructured Brown’s contract, his paycheck for the Bengals game was $53,823.53. The Steelers, according to Cindrich, could try to recoup a pro-rated portion of Brown’s signing bonus, which is allowed per terms of the collective bargaining agreement and standard NFL player contract.

Brown might have violated Article 4, Section 9 of the CBA, which deals with forfeiture of salary. A breach can occur for a player who “willfully fails to report, practice or play with the result that the player’s ability to fully participate and contribute to the team is substantially undermined (for example, without limitation, holding out or leaving the squad absent a showing of extreme persona hardship).”

Under such a breach, the player might be required to forfeit his “signing bonus, roster bonus, option bonus and/or reporting bonus.”

While the Steelers can’t go after bonus money from previous seasons, they can try to recoup money on the book for future seasons, according to the CBA. His $19 million signing bonus was spread over five years, with three years and $11.4 million remaining on the Steelers salary cap. Brown’s $2.5 million roster bonus due March 17 also could be at stake, as well the $9.72 million remaining on his restructure bonus.

“To me, the signing bonus is at risk,” Cindrich said. “You can be a prima donna in a lot of different ways, but you have to show up and do what you are supposed to do. He has to abide by all the rules and regulations of that contract. Basically, they have a player. There’s not a lot of wiggle room.”

A Steelers spokesman said the team would not comment on whether they intend to pursue financial remuneration. Drew Rosenhaus, Brown’s agent, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Because of his dealings with the Steelers — Hall of Fame center Dermontti Dawson was one of his clients — Cindrich doesn’t think the organization will take such action against Brown.

“They are not vindictive and rinky dinky,” Cindrich said. “The Steelers generally want to get past things. But here, they were clearly wronged.”

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at [email protected] or via Twitter @tribjoerutter.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe by email at [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.